Quantcast
Channel: Bugs – Oracle Scratchpad
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 123

FBI decode

$
0
0

It probably won’t surprise many people to hear me say that the decode() function can be a bit of a nuisance; and I’ll bet that quite a lot of people have had trouble occasionally trying to get function-based indexes that use this function to behave properly. So (to put it all together and support the general directives that case is probably a better choice than decode() and that the cast() operator is an important thing to learn) here’s an example of how function-based indexes don’t always allow you to work around bad design/code. (Note: this is a model of a problem I picked up at a client site, stripped to a minimum – you have to pretend that I’m not allowed to fix the problem by changing code).

First we create some data and indexes, and gather all relevant stats:


create table t1 (
	state	varchar2(10),
	n1	number,
	v1	varchar2(10),
	padding varchar2(100)
);

insert into t1
select
	decode(mod(rownum,100),0,'OPEN','CLOSED'),
	rownum,
	lpad(rownum,10,0),
	rpad('x',100,'x')
from
	all_objects
where
	rownum <= 5000;

create index t1_f1 on t1(decode(state,'CLOSED', to_number(null), n1 ));

create index t1_f2 on t1(to_number(decode(state,'CLOSED', null, n1 ))); 

begin
	dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(
 		ownname		 => user,
		tabname		 =>'T1',
		estimate_percent	 => 100,
		method_opt 	 => 'for all columns size 1'
	);
end;
/

Before doing anything else, take a look at the index definitions and compare them with the definitions that Oracle has stored in the data dictionary – notice what’s gone missing in the first one and what’s appeared in the second one:


column index_name format a10		heading "Index"
column column_position format 999	heading "Posn"
column column_expression format a72	heading "Expression"

select
	index_name, column_position, column_expression
from
	user_ind_expressions
where
	table_name = 'T1'
;

Index      Posn Expression
---------- ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
T1_F1         1 DECODE("STATE",'CLOSED',NULL,"N1")
T1_F2         1 TO_NUMBER(DECODE("STATE",'CLOSED',NULL,TO_CHAR("N1")))

Now we run a couple of queries that should be able to use the indexes we’ve defined. We’ll even include hints so that we don’t have to rely on the statistics to allow the optimizer to pick the right index:

select
	/*+ index(t1 t1_f1) */
	v1
from
	t1
where
	decode(state,'CLOSED', to_number(null), n1 ) = 100
;

select
	/*+ index(t1 t1_f2) */
	v1
from
	t1
where
	to_number(decode(state,'CLOSED', null, n1 )) = 100
;

The effects vary with version of Oracle:

  • 10.2.0.5: doesn’t use the index for the first query, but uses the index for the second query.

so let’s go up a version

  • 11.1.0.7: doesn’t use the index for the first query, and doesn’t use the index for the second query which also returns the wrong result – oops;

never mind, maybe it will work in 11gR2

  • 11.2.0.4: doesn’t use the index for the first query, and doesn’t use the index for the second query – but at least it doesn’t return the wrong result … because it crashes with Oracle error ORA-01722: invalid number.

Still, there’s always 12c

  • 12.1.0.1: does exactly the same as 11.2.0.4

An interesting oddity – the generated predicate that causes the extra problems from 11g onwards doesn’t match the index definition (viz: the expression is transformed one way to create the index, and another way when used in a predicate). Here’s the execution plan pulled from the 12.1.0.1 memory (with a little bit of cosmetic tidying):

----------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation         | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost  |
----------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |      |       |       |    15 |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1   |     1 |    13 |    15 |
----------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
   1 - filter(TO_NUMBER(TO_CHAR(DECODE("STATE",'CLOSED',NULL,TO_CHAR("N1"))))=100)

Notice how an extra to_char() has slipped into the predicate.

I suspect the problems are appearing because of the way that decode() uses the data type of its first output parameter to coerce the type of all subsequent output parameters (which is why I used to_number(null) in the first index) – but somewhere along the line the transformation engine seems to be getting a little lost.

If you run into this type of problem and you can change the SQL then two things may help:

  • cast(null as number) didn’t cause a problem, and allowed an FBI to work.
  • case when state = ‘CLOSED’ then to_number(null) else n1 end allowed an FBI to work


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 123

Trending Articles